Researchers have been studying the way our minds function in making decisions for half a century. In business, this means that we’re likely to hold onto initial reports, evidence or sound bites, anchoring … This simple mental shortcut helps us to make the continuous stream of distance judgments required to navigate the world. Here are several examples of the anchoring bias in action: 1. Naturally, then, we are drawn to information that supports our subconscious leanings. Executives should recognize that, in an uncertain world where unforeseeable events are common, good decisions can sometimes lead to bad outcomes. The first frame, with its reference point of zero, emphasizes incremental gains and losses, and the thought of losing triggers a conservative response in many people’s minds. They could come from old data or even from stereotypes. Economists Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman first documented the anchoring bias in an experiment involving a roulette wheel marked with integers rangin… Examples of Anchoring Bias. And basically asked them are the chances of this person having lung disease higher or lower than, and then the researcher picked a random probability. In business, a common anchor is a past event or trend. In one series of tests, people were asked to forecast the next week’s closing value for the Dow Jones Industrial Average. Once again, the two questions pose the same problem. The first is our tendency to subconsciously decide what we want to do before we figure out why we want to do it. Forewarned is forearmed. Are you really gathering information to help you make a smart choice, or are you just looking for evidence confirming what you think you’d like to do? Decision makers display, for example, a strong bias toward alternatives that perpetuate the status quo. The second frame, with its reference point of $2,000, puts things into perspective by emphasizing the real financial impact of the decision. In this column, I’ll describe how anchoring, ordering, framing, and loss aversion affect people’s decisions. The third? How might leaders adapt to such significant transitions in order to maintain success? But managers who are aware of the dangers of anchors can reduce their impact by using the following techniques: We all like to believe that we make decisions rationally and objectively. Look for distortions caused by the frames. This simple test illustrates the common and often pernicious mental phenomenon known as anchoring. Do so only when it … Highly complex and important decisions are the most prone to distortion because they tend to involve the most assumptions, the most estimates, and the most inputs from the most people. Psychologists Brian Wansink, Robert Kent, and Stephen Hoch studied how multiple unit pricing increased supermarket sales. The anchoring trap is an easy one to fall for. While your answers to both questions should, rationally speaking, be the same, studies have shown that many people would refuse the fifty-fifty chance in the first question but accept it in the second. How would you answer these two questions? To test the effect of knowledge of existence of anchoring, students were reminded of its existence. Research highlights Anchoring bias is a process whereby people are influenced by specific information given before a judgement. Breaking from the status quo means taking action, and when we take action, we take responsibility, thus opening ourselves to criticism and to regret. Over the years, weve posed those questions to many groups of people. The anchoring effect is both robust and has many implications in all decision making processes. Always view a problem from different perspectives. They proposed an initial price in the midrange of market rates and asked the owners to share in the renovation expenses, but they accepted all the other terms. When considering a decision, the mind gives disproportionate weight to the first information it receives. The hidden traps in decision making can affect the profitability of a company. Shoppers pour over endless sales ads, map their shopping routes and time their visits all for the chance to receive steep discounts. Pears targeted the problems of wrinkles if the consumer … When others recommend decisions, examine the way they framed the problem. Every competitor was promoting its toilet soaps through negatively framed messages. In half the cases, we used 35 million in the first question; in the other half, we used 100 million. The hidden traps in decision making can affect the profitability of a company. The seller gives you an initial price and then you negotiate. As leaders attempt to navigate the endless streams of choices that come their way, decisions serve as temporary anchors that provide a momentary respite to catch our breath, gather our bearings and ready ourselves to navigate the next wave of decisions. Anchoring and relying on first impressions. Most of us have fallen into this trap. The confirming-evidence trap leads us to seek out information supporting an existing predilection and to discount opposing information. For example, the initial price offered for a used car sets the standard for the rest of the negotiations , so that prices lower than the initial price seem more reasonable even if they are still higher than what the car is really worth. “Understanding what these traps are and how they affect decision making is critical to understand how people arrive at their conclusions.”. Smart Choices: A Practical Guide to Making Better Decisions, John S. Hammond, Ralph L. Keeney, and Howard Raiffa. Much money has been wasted on ill-fated product-development projects because managers did not accurately account for the possibility of market failure. When considering a problem, the mind gives disproportionate weight to the first information it receives. What’s your best estimate of Turkey’s population? To reduce insurance costs, two neighboring states, New Jersey and Pennsylvania, made similar changes in their laws. The status-quo trap biases us toward maintaining the current situation--even when better alternatives exist. Consider the experience of a large consulting firm that was searching for new office space in San Francisco. What Is Anchoring Bias? In rewarding people, look at the quality of their decision making (taking into account what was known at the time their decisions were made), not just the quality of the outcomes. In business, where sins of commission (doing something) tend to be punished much more severely than sins of omission (doing nothing), the status quo holds a particularly strong attraction. 2. Not sure which one is right for you? Executives who attempt to familiarize themselves with these traps and the diverse forms they take will be better able to ensure that the decisions they make are sound and that the recommendations proposed by subordinates or associates are reliable. Always remind yourself of your objectives and examine how they would be served by the status quo. If the penalties for making a decision that leads to an unfavorable outcome are overly severe, managers will be motivated to let failed projects drag on endlessly—in the vain hope that they’ll somehow be able to transform them into successes. In 1974, Tversky and Kahneman (two of the most influential people in behavioral economics) conducted a classic study that looked at people’s judgment-making process when they’re uncertain about the issue at hand. 193-195) Most decision makers have a strong bias towards choices that maintain the status quo. And the recallability trap prompts us to give undue weight to recent, dramatic events. But “later” is usually never. The Antidote. The psychological miscues cascade, making it harder and harder to choose wisely. Or we may have poured enormous effort into improving the performance of an employee whom we knew we shouldn’t have hired in the first place. Learn more in CFI’s Behavioral Finance Course. While you might expect that about half would have wanted to make the exchange, only one in ten actually did. Having failed to seize the occasion when change would have been expected, management finds itself stuck with the status quo. Relativity Trap: A psychological or behavioral trap that leads people to make irrational choices when making spending decisions. A well-known cognitive bias in negotiation and in other contexts, the anchoring bias describes the common tendency to give too much weight to the first number put forth in a discussion and then inadequately adjust from that starting point, or the “anchor.” We even fixate on anchors when we know they are irrelevant to the discussion at hand.
2020 anchoring trap example